[Ccarc] FW: [InHam] [Fwd: [SMC] New FM net on 146.49, Thursdays 8:30pm]
Tom Murray
kb9wsl at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 21 20:25:30 EDT 2008
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:28:34 -0400
> From: dan.evans at insightbb.com
> To: inham at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [InHam] [Fwd: [SMC] New FM net on 146.49, Thursdays 8:30pm]
>
> Think you have a "good" 2m FM station? Here is a challenge for you!
>
> Many folks would be surprised just how far "normal FM simplex" range is...
>
> 73
> Dan
> --
> K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269
> Check out the Rover Resource Page at: <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla>
> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books
> Ask me how to join the Indiana Ham Mailing list!
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [SMC] New FM net on 146.49, Thursdays 8:30pm
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:14:33 -0500
> From: Todd Sprinkmann <sprinkies at excel.net>
> To: badgercontesters at mailman.qth.net, SMC at w9smc.com,
> nlrs at mailman.qth.net, cvvhf at cvvhf.org
>
>
>
> Hello again,
>
> While I realize this email will be reaching a lot of
> stations outside normal FM simplex range, I figured it
> wouldn't hurt to get this new net some publicity.
>
> I'm going to start running a net for the FM side. It
> will run every Thursday (lightning permitting) on 146.49,
> simplex, starting at 8:30pm. Just like our SSB nets, the
> purpose is to stir up activity on the bands.
>
> I personally haven't done much work on 146 FM, save for
> some contest Q's. I'd like to reach out more to the FM
> side, and see how it goes.
>
> I don't have rotatable beams for FM. I do have a dual-
> band (146 and 440) omni at about 60' and that does pretty
> well on 146. I also have a 10 element beam on 146 up
> about 60', fixed toward Milwaukee and Chicago. I think for
> the first net, I'll try to just use the omni and see
> how that goes. As time goes by, I will work the beam into
> the equation, as well.
>
> I have been pushing for more FM participation in the
> contests, and my hope is this net will eventually get some
> FM ops more interested in contesting. Or perhaps other
> FM nets will be created in different areas.
>
> I've spread word of this net to some local repeater
> groups and reflectors, and I suspect we'll have decent
> participation.
>
> What I'd like everyone reading this email to consider is
> this: How can you help increase FM participation in contests?
>
> If this net has decent activity, I plan on running it
> for at least the next several months. I'll make
> some new acquaintances and hopefully the Milwaukee area
> will see increased FM activity in both the September and
> January ARRL VHF/UHF contests.
>
> Any thoughts, feedback welcomed.
>
> 73,
> Todd KC9BQA EN63ao 40 N of Milwaukee
> 50 thru 2304
>
>
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> SMC Web Site: http://www.w9smc.com
> List Help: http://mail.w9smc.com/mailman/listinfo/smc_w9smc.com
> Submissions: smc at w9smc.com Problems?Contact: smc-owner at w9smc.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> InHam mailing list
> InHam at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/inham
_________________________________________________________________
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ns1.culcom.net/pipermail/ccarc/attachments/20080821/e14a24a8/attachment.htm
More information about the ccarc
mailing list